Originally published by Brandee Bower.
There are occurrence and claims-made insurance policies. In both, there is a ‘prompt’ notice requirement. However, a claims-made policy has a ‘date-certain’ notice requirement that effectuates the limits of coverage. Earlier Colorado court holdings had not addressed this and a recent Colorado Supreme Court opinion determined public policy concerns are not in favor of applying a notice-prejudice rule.1 Thus, the notice-prejudice rule does not apply to a date-certain notice requirement in a claims-made insurance policy.
In reviewing the notice-prejudice rule, the question is whether the insurance company is prejudiced by an insured’s failure to notify of a loss. Said another way, does the insured’s breach of the policy requirement defeat the purpose of the requirement? Other jurisdictions offer persuasive public policy justifications for applying the notice-prejudice rule, including “(1) the adhesive nature of insurance contracts, (2) the public policy objective of compensating…
.
Curated by Texas Bar Today. Follow us on Twitter @texasbartoday.
from Texas Bar Today http://ift.tt/1FY92ku
via Abogado Aly Website
No comments:
Post a Comment