Tuesday, June 25, 2019

No reversible jury charge error

Originally published by David Coale.

The federal system’s more-forgiving approach to what Texas state practice calls “the Casteel problem was on display in Young v. Board of Supervisors of Humphreys County, Mississippi. After a jury trial, Young won a judgment under § 1983 for depriving him of the use of several properties. Among other appeal points, “The Board takes issue with Jury Instruction 4, which told the jury that it could find the Board liable if it found, by a preponderance of the evidence, one of three things: (1) ‘The Board of Supervisors authorized a violation of Mr. Young’s property rights,’ (2) ‘Dickie Stevens had been given the authority by the Board to take the action he took with respect to Mr. Young’s property,’ or (3) ‘The Board ratified Dickie Stevens’ actions after the fact.’” The Fifth Circuit held that as to the second theory, “[e]ven assuming that the court erred in allowing the jury to determine whether Stevens was a policymaker, there was legally sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to hold the Board liable on a ratification [the third] theory . . . Thus, ‘any injury resulting from the erroneous instruction is
harmless.’ No. 18-60618 (June 21, 2019).

Curated by Texas Bar Today. Follow us on Twitter @texasbartoday.



from Texas Bar Today http://bit.ly/2KBNbfa
via Abogado Aly Website

No comments:

Post a Comment