Originally published by David Coale.
A colorful, and deft, summary of Iqbal’s pleading requirements in a § 1983 case appeared in Shaw v. Villanueva: “Shaw[] . . . has pleaded no specific facts showing that Villanueva and Ebrom misdirected Sotelo into issuing the arrest warrant. And so he has not established the exception to the independent-intermediary doctrine. In other words, his allegations are all broth and no beans.” No. 17-50937 (March 11, 2019). (A classic Texas Monthly article offers similar sayings, such as: “He thinks the sun comes up just to hear him crow,” etc.)
Curated by Texas Bar Today. Follow us on Twitter @texasbartoday.
from Texas Bar Today https://ift.tt/2HyRmXC
via Abogado Aly Website
No comments:
Post a Comment