The Fifth Circuit was unwilling to extend a bankruptcy court’s “core” or “related-to” jurisdiction to reach a settlement agreement when:
“[T]he settlements contradict the plan. Whereas the plan discharged debts unless a timely proof of claim was filed, the settlements require Chesapeake to pay the non-filing lessors a portion of their royalty claims far higher than other creditors’ timely filed general unsecured claims. Whereas the plan assumed that Chesapeake’s leases would ride through bankruptcy unaffected, the settlement requires a mandatory alteration in the terms of thousands of Pennsylvania leases. Far from merely enforcing the plan, the settlement accomplished a self-described ‘fundamental reset of Chesapeake’s relationship with its Pennsylvania lessors.’”
No. 21-20232 (June 8, 2023).
The post Beyond Bankruptcy Jurisdiction appeared first on 600 Camp.
from Texas Bar Today https://ift.tt/i7540Ih
via Abogado Aly Website
No comments:
Post a Comment