Promissory Estoppel v. Fraud v. Unclean Hands

Originally published by David Coale.

Cornwell v. Scothorn addressed the interplay between the opposing sides’ fraud and promissory estoppel claim. It distinguished El Paso Healthcare System v. Piping Rock Corp., 939 S.W.2d 695 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1997, writ denied), as “address[ing] whether an unclean hands defense barred recovery on a promissory estoppel claim. Piping Rock does not stand for the proposition that Stewart’s fraud in this case negated the Scothorns’ promissory estoppel claims. Ro the extent the jury found Stewart committed fraud and damaged McKinney $9427.86 in out-of-pocket damages and $8000 in damages for loss of credit reputation, we cannot conclude this finding precluded the jury from also finding that the Scothorns were entitled to damages of $201,318.04 on their promissory estoppel claim against Cornwell and McKinney.” No. 05-18-00799-CV (Sept. 17, 2020) (mem. op.).

The post Promissory Estoppel v. Fraud v. Unclean Hands appeared first on 600 Commerce.

Curated by Texas Bar Today. Follow us on Twitter @texasbartoday.

from Texas Bar Today https://ift.tt/32QtE2f
via Abogado Aly Website