Originally published by David Coale.
Are unpublished opinions introducing murkiness into a legal issue? Rein them in with Garcia v. Professional Contract Servcs., Inc., No. 18-50144, (Sept. 11, 2019), which:
- Limited their holdings: “The company points to a couple of unpublished decisions of our court that have flagged the circuit split over this issue. These decisions do not reference the binding Fifth Circuit precedent on this point because they did not need to: both decisions resolved the cases before them on other grounds.” (citations omitted); and
- Dismissed their precedential value: “To the extent some unpublished cases have introduced murkiness into the case law in this area, that confusion should be resolved by applying our binding precedent.”
Curated by Texas Bar Today. Follow us on Twitter @texasbartoday.
from Texas Bar Today https://ift.tt/2LIXw8e
via Abogado Aly Website
No comments:
Post a Comment