Originally published by David Coale.
Cordero, a district sales manager for Avon, contended that she was due a $70,850 bonus for the first quarter of 2013. Avon paid her $1,200, noting that several sales leaders who reported to her had created roughly $450,000 of fraudulent orders (although Cordero was not involved). Nevertheless, Cordero contended that the terms “met” and “achievement” in her compensation agreement referred to product that was “ordered, shipped, and notated on Avon’s quarterly report.” The Fifth Circuit agreed with Avon that those terms necessarily referred to legitimate activity; otherwise, the contract did not advance a sensible business goal. Cordero v. Avon Products, No. 15-40563 (Oct. 29, 2015, unpublished).
Curated by Texas Bar Today. Follow us on Twitter @texasbartoday.
from Texas Bar Today http://ift.tt/20vw65U
via Abogado Aly Website
No comments:
Post a Comment