Originally published by Charles Sartain.
Posted by Charles Sartain
Co-author Brooke Sizer
Another Louisiana court has ruled that the Subsequent Purchaser Rule applies to damages following a mineral lease. In Bundrick v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp. it is the 3rd Circuit.
The Rule:
An owner of property had no right or actual interest in recovering from a third party for damage which was inflicted on the property before his purchase, in the absence of an assignment or subrogation of the rights belonging to the owner of the property when the damage was inflicted.
The Case
The plaintiffs bought seven tracts in St. Martin Parish that had been previously leased and subject to oil and gas production. They acquired the property after the expiration of the mineral leases and without obtaining an assignment of their predecessor-in-interest’s right to proceed against responsible parties. Oops!
Plaintiffs argued that the 12 defendants were negligent and strictly liable for the damage and that their conduct created a continuing and damaging nuisance and continuing trespass on the property.
They were denied recovery because they had not been assigned the rights of the prior owners to sue for damages. That right is a personal right and is not transferred to a subsequent owner without a clear stipulation to that effect.
Why is This Case Different from Eagle Pipe?
The plaintiffs wanted it to be, but the court said it isn’t. In Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp. the Louisiana Supreme Court relied upon the Subsequent Purchaser Rule to deny recovery to plaintiffs for contamination.
In Eagle Pipe the defendants operated under a surface lease and the Supreme Court specifically declined to rule on whether the doctrine applied to mineral leases. A different 3rd Circuit panel had ruled that the Rule did not apply to operations under a mineral lease. But the Supreme Court later told the 1st Circuit that they should apply Eagle Pipe to facts involving mineral leases. In Bundrick the 3rd Circuit did just that.
The plaintiffs also argued a cause of action for remediation of the contaminated property pursuant to Louisiana Mineral Code Art.11, because mineral rights are real rights that pass with the property to the subsequent purchaser without the need for a specific assignment. According to the court, Eagle Pipe clearly stated that leases convey personal rights only and these rights must be expressly assigned.
Why is That Man in This Blog?
Visit here often enough and you won’t usually find agreement with LSU grad James Carville. But then there was his address to the 2015 graduating class of LSU’s Manship School of Communication. Always entertaining, he decried the looming destruction of Louisiana higher education by Gov. Bobby Jindal and asked what the grads – and proud parents – are going to do about it.
Here’s something to do about it: Think of Bobby Jindal as you would an unprincipled, ambitious college football coach. He cheats, achieves fame and success, and is off to a bigger contract before sanctions hit the fan. Or see him as an abscess. Tea Party tax relief metastacizes, and breaks catastrophically bad for those around him. He is Grover Norquist’s “girlfriend”. His lust for the power of higher office could leave Louisiana healthcare and higher education impoverished for years.
Mr. Carville and the crowd closed with this sing-along.
Curated by Texas Bar Today. Follow us on Twitter @texasbartoday.
from Texas Bar Today http://ift.tt/1I9gWcT
via Abogado Aly Website
No comments:
Post a Comment