Originally published by David Yates.
On Thursday, the Texas Ninth Court of Appeals axed one of top 100 national jury verdicts of 2013, dismissing Domino’s Pizza from a Beaumont lawsuit brought by Raghurami Reddy.
In August 2013, a Jefferson County jury deemed Domino’s as the negligent party behind a pizza delivery driver’s fatal collision, serving up a $32 million dollar verdict against the popular pizza chain.
Representing the estates of Devavaram and Ruth Christopher, Reddy filed suit against Domino’s IP Holder, MAC Pizza Management (a franchisee of Domino’s) and Joshua Balka (a pizza delivery driver at the time) on Sept. 7, 2012, in Jefferson County District Court.
Court records show that on Aug. 11, 2012, the Christophers were traveling on S. Major Drive in Beaumont when a Balka, who was in the employment of MAC Pizza, crossed the center lane and struck their vehicle head-on.
Wet pavement and a bald tire caused Balka to hydroplane into traffic. The police officer called to the scene cited Balka for failing to control his speed and for having an unsafe or defective tire, court papers say.
Ruth, 65, sustained injuries and died the next day while Devavram, 70, sustained a permanent traumatic brain injury and was left with no positive cognitive function, the suit states.
MAC Pizza settled with Reddy, leaving Domino’s as the feature defendant on trial.
Jurors found all three defendant parties, Balka, Domino’s and MAC Pizza, to be negligent in causing the collision, assigning the majority of the blame, 60 percent, to Domino’s, according to the court’s charge to the jury.
On appeal, Domino’s argued that the evidence is legally insufficient to establish that it owed a duty to the Christophers because the company had no right to control MAC Pizza’s day-to-day operations.
Justices on the Ninth Court agreed.
“Based on the record before us, we conclude that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the jury’s finding that Domino’s controlled or had the right to control the details of the injury-producing acts or omissions of MAC and its employees,” states the court’s opinion, authored by Chief Justice Steve McKeithen.
“The record indicates that MAC was free to use its own means and methods as to the details of its work. We reverse the trial court’s judgment and render judgment dismissing Reddy’s claims against Domino’s.”
A total of $32,154,506 in damages was awarded by the jury, which includes damages for mental anguish, loss of companionship, funeral expenses, medical expenses, impairment and disfigurement.
The National Law Journal ranked the verdict No. 60 nationally for 2013. For Texas verdicts that year, the case breached the Top 5.
Provost Umphrey attorney Paul “Chip” Ferguson represented Reddy during the trial.
Woodlands attorney Kenna Seiler represents him on appeal.
Domino’s is represented in part by Houston attorney Phil Griffis.
Trial case No. A192-970
Appeals Case No. 09-14-00058-CV
The post Texas justices wipe big 2013 jury verdict, reverse $32M judgment against Domino’s appeared first on Southeast Texas Record.
Curated by Texas Bar Today. Follow us on Twitter @texasbartoday.
from Texas Bar Today http://ift.tt/1EvF4Su
via
Abogado Aly Website
To highlight some of the posts that stand out from the crowd, the editors of Texas Bar Today have created a list from the week’s blog posts of the top ten based on subject matter, writing style, headline, and imagery. We hope you enjoy this installment.
To highlight some of the posts that stand out from the crowd, the editors of Texas Bar Today have created a list from the week’s blog posts of the top ten based on subject matter, writing style, headline, and imagery. We hope you enjoy this installment.
