District Court Holds that Delinquent Payment and Filing After CI Agent Contact Is Admissible in Criminal Case (7/5/21)

In United States v. Thrush, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118742 (E.D. Mich. 6/25/21), CL here, “Thrush was indicted on multiple counts of willfully failing to pay over payroll taxes and to file tax returns.”  After being contacted by the CI agent, Thrush “began making payments on his tax liability” and filed tax returns.  In the ensuing criminal case, the Government moved in limine “to exclude evidence of Defendant’s delinquent tax payments and returns.”  

The Court held that, under Sixth Circuit precedent, Thrush could introduce the evidence.  After reviewing the case authority, the Court concluded (pp. 9-10):

Defendant’s version of events, if believed, would allow a reasonable jury to infer that his failure to pay taxes and file tax returns was the result of ignorance, rather than willfulness. Accordingly, Defendant’s [*10]  delinquent filings, if offered in conjunction with the assertions discussed above, would be probative of his mental state during the period in question.

In comparison, evidence of the delinquent filings poses only a modest risk of misleading the jury. The evidence will not, and cannot, be offered to show that Defendant’s prior crimes, if any, were somehow vitiated, see Sansone 380 U.S. at 354, and the jury will be clearly instructed as to the elements of the charged offenses and the meaning of willfulness.

Based on the foregoing, the Government has not demonstrated that the probative value of Defendant’s delinquent filings is substantially outweighed by the risk of misleading the jury.

JAT Comments:

1.  The Government wants to exclude delinquent payment and filings because a jury may think what’s the big deal, he has paid and acquit on that basis alone.  Of course, as the court notes, the delinquent payment and filings may show, in context, that the defendant is innocent in that he did not have an original intent to violate a known duty, because when he found about the duty he complied with it.

2.  The lesson is that, when contacted by CI, the defendant and his counsel should consider delinquent filings.  Of course, the delinquent filings will establish the tax due and owing element of some tax crimes, but if it defeats the willfulness element (intent to violate a known legal duty), then it works.

from Texas Bar Today https://ift.tt/3jQB8eD
via Abogado Aly Website